Journal Details
Aphasiology
Instructions for Authors
If the journal you are submitting to is on ScholarOne Manuscripts (previously Manuscript Central), please read the guide for ScholarOne authors.
Aphasiology considers all manuscripts at the Editor's discretion; and the Editor's decision is final.
GENERAL GUIDELINES
Aphasiology is concerned with all aspects of language impairment and related disorders resulting from brain damage. The journal encourages papers which address theoretical, empirical, and clinical topics from any disciplinary perspective; cross disciplinary work is welcome. Aphasiology publishes peer reviewed clinical and experimental research papers, review essays, theoretical notes, comments, and critiques. Research reports can take the form of group studies, single case studies, or surveys, on psychological, linguistic, medical, and social aspects of aphasia. Ideas for Clinical Fora are welcome.
Aphasiology publishes several kinds of contribution:
- review articles - peer-refereed, reflective theoretically based papers exploring existing thinking, methodologies, and presenting new perspectives.
- research reports - accounts of qualitative and quantitative enquiries, including implications for future practice and directions for future research.
- clinical forums - discussion and exchanges of views on key clinical issues.
- research notes - short reports on work of a preliminary nature.
- book reviews - concise and critical insights into newly published books.
Supplementary image, movie and audio files can be added to any article and our website supports a wide range of file types for different applications, as follows: Images: png; jpg; gif. Movies: mpg; mov; avi. Audio: Wav; mp3. Compression: Zip. Documents/tables: xls; csv; doc; pdf; txt.
Contacting the Editors:
Professor Chris Code, School of Psychology, Washington Singer Laboratories, Exeter University, Perry Road, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK. Email: C.F.S.Code@exeter.ac.uk Tel: +44 01392 264642. Fax: +44 01392 264623
Professor Robert Marshall, Rehabilitation Sciences and Division of Communication Disorders, University of Kentucky, UK Wethington Building, Room 124-F, 900 S. Limestone, Lexington, KY, 40536-0200, USA.
Book Reviews
Books for review, or offers to review a book, should be sent to:
Ethics and Consent Standards
Copyright - It is a condition of publication that authors assign copyright or license the publication rights in their articles, including abstracts, to Taylor & Francis. This enables us to ensure full copyright protection and to disseminate the article, and of course the Journal, to the widest possible readership in print and electronic formats as appropriate. Authors retain many rights under Taylor and Francis rights policy.
- Please write clearly and concisely, stating your objectives clearly and defining your terms. Your arguments should be substantiated with well reasoned supporting evidence.
- In writing your paper, you are encouraged to review articles in the area you are addressing which have been previously published in the journal, and where you feel appropriate, to reference them. This will enhance context, coherence, and continuity for our readers.
- For all manuscripts, gender-, race-, and creed-inclusive language is mandatory.
- Ethics of Experimentation: Contributors are required to follow the procedures in force in their countries which govern the ethics of work done with human subjects. The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) represents a minimal requirement.
- Abstracts are required for all papers submitted, they should be between 150 and 400 words and should precede the text of a paper; see 'Abstracts'.
- Manuscripts should be double-spaced throughout, including the reference section.
- Authors should include telephone and fax numbers as well as e-mail addresses on the cover page of manuscripts.
Journal Production Editor: authorqueries@tandf.co.uk
ABSTRACTS
Structured Abstracts:
Authors submitting papers should note that from Volume 16 Issue 1 (2002), the journal is introducing Structured Abstracts. There is good evidence that Structured Abstracts are clearer for readers and facilitate better appropriate indexing and citation of papers.
The essential features of the Structured Abstract are given below. Note in particular that any clinical implications should be clearly stated.
Abstract (Between 150-400 words)
Background: Describe the background to the study;
Aims: State the aims and objectives of the study including any clear research questions or hypotheses.
Methods & Procedures: To include outline of the methodology and design of experiments; materials employed and subject/participant numbers with basic relevant demographic information; the nature of the analyses performed.
Outcomes & Results: Outline the important and relevant results of the analyses.
Conclusions: State the basic conclusions and implications of the study. State, clearly and usefully, if there are implications for management, treatment or service delivery.
Review Abstract:
Background: Outline the background to the review.
Aims: State the primary objective of the paper; the reasons behind your critical review and analyses of the literature; your approach and methods if relevant.
Main Contribution: The main outcomes of the paper and results of analyses; and any implications for future research and for management, treatment or service delivery.
Conclusions: State your main conclusions.
FORMAT
Papers should be prepared in the format prescribed by the American Psychological Association. For full details of this format, please see the Publication Manual of the APA (5th edition).
Typescripts. The style and format of the typescripts should conform to the specifications given in the Publication Manual of the APA (6th edition). Typescripts should be double spaced on A4 paper, with adequate margins, and numbered throughout. The title page of an article should contain only:
(1) the title of the paper (as concise as possible), the name(s) of the authors and full postal address(es) of their institution(s);
(2) a short title not exceeding 40 letters and spaces, which will be used for page headlines;
(3) name and address of the author to whom correspondence and proofs should be sent;
(4) your telephone, fax and e-mail numbers, as this helps speed of processing considerably.
Abstract. As above.
Headings. Indicate headings and subheadings for different sections of the paper clearly. Do not number headings.
Acknowledgements. These should be as brief as possible and typed on a separate sheet at the beginning of the text.
Permission to quote. Any direct quotation, regardless of length, must be accompanied by a reference citation that includes a page number. Any quote over six manuscript lines should have formal written permission to quote from the copyright owner. It is the author's responsibility to determine whether permission is required from the copyright owner and, if so, to obtain it. (See "Seeking permission to use other sources" for a template letter to use when seeking copyright permission.)
Footnotes. These should be avoided unless absolutely necessary. Essential footnotes should be indicated by superscript figures in the text and collected on a separate sheet at the end of the manuscript.
Reference list. A full list of references quoted in the text should be given at the end of the paper in alphabetical order of authors' surnames (or chronologically for a group of references by the same authors), commencing as a new page, typed double spaced. Titles of journals and books should be given in full, e.g.:
Books:
Rayner, E., Joyce, A., Rose, J., Twyman, M., & Clulow, C. (2008). Human development: An introduction to the psychodynamics of growth, maturity and ageing (4th ed.). Hove, UK: Routledge.
Chapter in edited book:
Craik, F. I. M., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1998). Encoding processes: Similarities and differences. In M. A. Conway, S. E. Gathercole, & C. Cornoldi (Eds.), Theories of memory (Vol. 2, pp. 61–86). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Journal article:
Adlington, R. L., Laws, K. R., & Gale, T. M. (2009). The Hatfield Image Test (HIT): A new picture test and norms for experimental and clinical use. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31, 731–753. doi:10.1080/13803390802488103
Tables. These should be kept to the minimum. Each table should be typed double spaced on a separate sheet, giving the heading, e.g., "Table 2", in Arabic numerals, followed by the legend, followed by the table. Make sure that appropriate units are given. Instructions for placing the table should be given in parentheses in the text, e.g., "(Table 2 about here)".
Figures. Figures should only be used when essential and the same data should not be presented both as a figure and in a table. Where possible, related diagrams should be grouped together to form a single figure. Each figure should be on a separate page, not integrated with the text. The figure captions should be typed in a separate section, headed, e.g., "Figure 2", in Arabic numerals. Instructions for placing the figure should be given in parentheses in the text, e.g., "(Figure 2 about here)".
For more detailed guidelines see Preparation of Figure Artwork.
Statistics. Results of statistical tests should be given in the following form:
"... results showed an effect of group, F(2, 21) = 13.74, MSE = 451.98, p < .001, but there was no effect of repeated trials, F(5, 105) = 1.44, MSE = 17.70, and no interaction, F(10, 105) = 1.34, MSE = 17.70."
Notes on Participant Description
Submissions involving research with aphasic participants should include, wherever necessary (and this will be the case for most submissions), adequate participant descriptions and assessment details. Brookshire (1983) provides a list of factors (below) reviewed and updated recently by Roberts et al. (2003) that referees can bear in mind when evaluating a submission.
Type Vision Handedness Sex Hemianopia Participant source IQ Hemiparesis First Language speaker Mood Time since onset Lateralisation of damage Severity Education Localisation of damageGreater detail will be required for single case studies than for large group studies. For single case studies detailed and clear assessment details including raw scores on assessments are usually required.
Robey et al. (1999) recommend that for single case treatment studies, sufficient detail (e.g., raw scores, descriptive statistics) is required so that standard deviations can be calculated from data presented to allow meta-analysis of series of published single case treatment studies.
Authors and referees please note that Aphasiology requires that the word 'aphasic' is written as an adjective, not a noun. There are two reasons for this. The first is the grammatical one and the second is that it is perceived as offensive by some to describe an aphasic person as 'an aphasic'. The first reason is trivial but adds support to the second, which is important. So the word 'aphasic' should always be qualified by 'participants, speaker, subject, client, patient, person', whichever is appropriate for the field of study (e.g., 'patient' in the context of a medical study, 'speaker' for linguistic and phonetic studies).
Brookshire, R. (1983) Subject description and generality of results in experiments with aphasic adults. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 48, 342-346.
Roberts, P. M., Code, C., & McNeil, M. R. (2003) Describing participants in aphasia research: Part I. Audit of current practice. Aphasiology, 17, 911-932.
Robey, R. R., Schultz, M. C., Crawford, A. B., & Sinner, C. A. (1999) Single-subject clinical-outcome research: Designs, data, effect sizes, and analyses. Aphasiology, 13, 445-473.
